<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kai Witte's Blog &#187; Whizlabs versus Enthuwre</title>
	<atom:link href="http://witte-consulting.com/blog/tag/whizlabs-versus-enthuwre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://witte-consulting.com/blog</link>
	<description>Brief articles by Kai Witte</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:58:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Whizlabs vs. Enthuware</title>
		<link>http://witte-consulting.com/blog/whizlabs-vs-enthuware-vs-whizlabs/</link>
		<comments>http://witte-consulting.com/blog/whizlabs-vs-enthuware-vs-whizlabs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 18:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kai Witte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enthuware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entuware versus Whizlabs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mock exam simulators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCBCD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCDJWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCJA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCJD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCJP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCWCD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whizlabs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whizlabs versus Enthuwre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://witte-consulting.com/blog/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I bought several exam simulators for mock exams: The one for SCJP 5.0 (CX-310-055) from Whizlabs The one for SCWCD 1.4 (CX-310-081) from Whizlabs The one for SCBCD 1.3 (CX-310-090) from Whizlabs The one for SCDJWS (CX-310-220) from Whizlabs The one for SCEA (CX-310-051) from Whizlabs More recently: The one for SCBCD 5.0 from Enthuware [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought several exam simulators for mock exams:</p>
<ul>
<li>The one for <a href="http://www.sun.com/training/certification/java/scjp.xml">SCJP 5.0</a> (CX-310-055) from Whizlabs</li>
<li>The one for <a href="http://www.sun.com/training/certification/java/discontinued.html">SCWCD 1.4</a> (CX-310-081) from Whizlabs</li>
<li>The one for <a href="http://www.sun.com/training/certification/java/discontinued.html">SCBCD 1.3</a> (CX-310-090) from Whizlabs</li>
<li>The one for <a href="http://www.sun.com/training/certification/java/scdjws.xml">SCDJWS</a> (CX-310-220) from Whizlabs</li>
<li>The one for <a href="http://www.sun.com/training/certification/java/discontinued.html">SCEA</a> (CX-310-051) from Whizlabs</li>
<li>More recently: The one for <a href="http://www.sun.com/training/certification/java/scbcd.xml">SCBCD 5.0</a> from Enthuware</a>
</ul>
<h4>License</h4>
<p>Enthuware uses a pretty normal end user software license, while Whizlabs plagues the user with a complicated activation procedure, only to limit the use to three CPUs! So when the user upgrades the CPU or gets a new computer, the license is lost. The three CPUs for which it works have to be chosen within 6 months after the purchase. That makes it pretty much useless for what I bought it, which is to keep my knowledge about topics that I currently don&#8217;t need at work up to date. Whizlabs simulators <strong>cannot</strong> be used for that. This is not much of an issue when the user wants to learn for a certificate and will never need the simulator again afterwards.</p>
<h4>Learning process, repetition scheme</h4>
<p>Whizlabs simulators have certain features which try to adept to the user (&#8220;adaptive testing&#8221;). As far as I know they do not follow proven methods from the field of education science, though.</p>
<p>Enthuware&#8217;s direct support for such features is limited. However, its comment system provides great flexibility for custom systems. My article <a href="http://witte-consulting.com/blog/effective-enthuware/">Effective Enthuware</a> describes how to use the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leitner_System">Leitner System</a> in the Enthuware Test Studio. That is <strong>the</strong> system for this type of learning.</p>
<h4>Supported Platforms</h4>
<p>Enthuware Test Studio requires JRE 5.0. The Whizlabs simulators support all common Microsoft Windows versions.</p>
<h4>Errata</h4>
<p>Enthuware Test Studio provides a direct link to the Enthuware forum post in which that question is being discussed. That can be helpful to find out if the proposed answer is incorrect, but recently I was usually the first one to check that out, so there were no other comments about that question.</p>
<h4>Useability</h4>
<p>Whizlabs has a Flash based GUI. It works well, but most things must be done with the mouse.<br />
Enthuware uses the common key and mouse bindings for GUIs (Swing with system&#8217;s default L&#038;F).</p>
<h4>Price</h4>
<p>For most exams the Whizlabs products are a little more expensive than the Enthuware products. For example <a href="http://www.whizlabs.com/scbcd/scbcd5.0-details.html">Whizlabs SCBCD 5.0 Preparation Kit</a> for USD 74.95, <a href="http://www.enthuware.com/alletsbanks.html">Enthuware EJB+ Full Version </a> for USD 29.00. </p>
<h4>Question Quality</h4>
<p>The big unknown. I do not know anything about a conclusive study regarding the question qualities. They are both at least okay.</p>
<h4>Question Quantity</h4>
<p>Untransparent for Whizlabs products, and varies from product to product.</p>
<h4>Conclusion</h4>
<p>I recommend the Enthuware products. The knock-out arguments are the license and the Leitner System support. A really nice objective test from a huge organisation would help, like the tests we have for cars and such, a test which would also examine question quality and study time / exam result ratio. But this market is just too small, so you have to do with subjective reports like mine.</p>
<p>See also the <a href="http://witte-consulting.com/blog/effective-enthuware/">Effective Enthuware</a> article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://witte-consulting.com/blog/whizlabs-vs-enthuware-vs-whizlabs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

